United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

06-1402

LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FISHER-PRICE, INC. and MATTEL, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.

Ron E. Shulman, Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati, of Palo Alto, California, argued for plaintiff-appellant. With him on the brief were Terry Kearney and Michael A. Berta.

James Galbraith, Kenyon & Kenyon LLP, of New York, New York, argued for defendants-appellees. With him on the brief were Richard L. DeLucia and John Flock; and John R. Hutchins, of Washington, DC. Of counsel was Jeffrey M. Butler, of New York, New York.

Appealed from: United States District Court for the District of Delaware

Judge Gregory M. Sleet

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

06-1402

LEAPFROG ENTERPRISES, INC.,
Plaintiff-Appellant,

v.

FISHER-PRICE, INC. and MATTEL, INC.,
Defendants-Appellees.

DECIDED: May 9, 2007

Before MAYER, LOURIE, and DYK, Circuit Judges.

LOURIE, Circuit Judge.

Leapfrog Enterprises, Inc. (“Leapfrog”) appeals from the order of the United States District Court for the District of Delaware entering judgment of noninfringement and invalidity of claim 25 of Leapfrog’s U.S. Patent 5,813,861 (“the ’861 patent”) in favor of Fisher-Price, Inc. and Mattel, Inc. (collectively “Fisher-Price”). We affirm.  Next Page ->